Comment on this Motifake
LEUPOLD OPTICSCreator: matt28  |  Comment using Facebook |
forseti - April 12, 2010, 1:07 am, #170875
| like the pic and didn't know the original, but this kind of copying is really bad... |
Faceplant31 - April 12, 2010, 8:10 am, #170899
| C'mon Grey and Forseti, this isn't copying. Can' you see that the original has three lines of text and this only has two. Man way to go matt28 5L - 5 for being a plagerising noob. |
forseti - April 12, 2010, 8:35 am, #170906
| Ok face, you're right. So I want to give one more lion. Would someone please give 1L for this so I get the right score given?!? .o0O(wondering about my grammar) |
corbett06 - April 18, 2011, 8:22 pm, #216743
| oh yeah leupold suck ive had one and they fricken suck...look up schmidt-bender of germany...leupold cannot compare at all trust me i own one. |
ICEMAN - April 18, 2011, 9:09 pm, #216746
| You've owned one example and now you are an expert on Leupold? I have four and there is no hint of a problem with any. Leupold is a good product. Period. |
M0rd3kaI - April 2, 2012, 3:05 pm, #232604
| In precision optics, many times it is a faulty user and not the scope... Agreed with ICEMAN, Leupold does it's job...Well |
Mooooooooooooooooooo - April 18, 2011, 10:39 pm, #216748
| you Americans and your guns...just whip 'em out already girls. |