Comment on this Motifake
Comment using Facebook
- April 11, 2010, 7:10 pm,
direct copy of
- April 12, 2010, 1:07 am,
like the pic and didn't know the original, but this kind of copying is really bad...
- April 12, 2010, 8:10 am,
C'mon Grey and Forseti, this isn't copying. Can' you see that the original has three lines of text and this only has two. Man way to go matt
5L - 5 for being a plagerising noob.
- April 12, 2010, 8:35 am,
Ok face, you're right. So I want to give one more lion. Would someone please give 1L for this so I get the right score given?!? .o0O(wondering about my grammar)
- April 18, 2011, 8:22 pm,
oh yeah leupold suck ive had one and they fricken suck...look up schmidt-bender of germany...leupold cannot compare at all trust me i own one.
- April 18, 2011, 9:09 pm,
You've owned one example and now you are an expert on Leupold? I have four and there is no hint of a problem with any. Leupold is a good product. Period.
- April 2, 2012, 3:05 pm,
In precision optics, many times it is a faulty user and not the scope... Agreed with ICEMAN, Leupold does it's job...Well
- April 18, 2011, 10:39 pm,
you Americans and your guns...just whip 'em out already girls.
Start new comment thread
Register in seconds...